Introduction
Here are some links to orbital mechanics stuff and dynamics in general.
Links
Three Degree of Freedom (Orbital)
https://orbital-mechanics.space/the-n-body-problem/circular-restricted-three-body-problem.html
Here are some links to orbital mechanics stuff and dynamics in general.
https://orbital-mechanics.space/the-n-body-problem/circular-restricted-three-body-problem.html
As lunar seasons do not correspond to consistent calendar dates, this Excel workbook tool was developed to allow users to efficiently explore expected future seasonal cycles using one of two methods. The first is a direct lookup of subsolar latitude and hemispheric seasonal state for a user-defined date. The second allows the user to specify a subsolar latitude range and temporal search window and will return all date ranges for which the subsolar latitude criterion is met. Both options provide plots that place the results in context.
Subsolar latitude values were calculated for 00:00:00 UTC on each day between 1 Jan 2020 and 31 Dec 2029 using the SpiceyPy subslr module and the following kernels: naif0012.tls (LSK), de438.bsp (SPK), moon_080317.tf (FK), pck00010.tpc (PCK), and moon_pa_de421_1900-2050.bpc (PCK) [3, 4]. Reported values have about ±0.04° uncertainty due to the maximum progression of the true value over the course of 24 hours; this is assumed to be higher than the degree of precision achieved with SPICE kernels over the decade the calculations cover.
The Lunar Season Calculator was developed by Sam Cartwright and Jordan Bretzfelder. We thank Dr. David Kring and LPI for their interest in hosting the tool. We are also greatly indebted to Andrew Annex and the other contributors to the SpiceyPy project. For questions or comments, please contact scartwright@nevada.unr.edu.
The purpose of the Lunar Surface Innovation Consortium (LSIC) is to harness the creativity, energy, and resources of the nation to help NASA keep the United States at the forefront of lunar exploration.
LSIC operates in collaboration with the NASA Space Technology Mission Directorate under the Lunar Surface Innovation Initiative (LSII). LSIC fosters communications and collaborations among academia, industry, and Government. Members have expertise in LSII key capability areas.
![]() |
| A possible future city on another world? |

Re-reading Robert Zubrin's books are fun since this guy has a definite cheeky sense of humor. Over spring break a few months back, I went to New York City and checked out the American Museum of Natural History while I was there. Surprisingly, there was a section in the museum for space. That was unexpected in a natural history museum but I suppose they just have to have everything. [Image Credit: Buzz Aldrin Mars Cycler - painting by Don Dixon for Scientific American]
Anyways, while I was at the Rose Center for Earth and Space, I happened across the book How to Live on Mars by Robert Zubrin and acquired it there. This book is a hilarious practical guide for anyone seeking to leave Earth and live in life in the late 21st century. Each chapter focuses on a specific aspect of Martian survival which includes how to get there, what to wear (outside of course), what rovers to get, what homes to acquire, how to choose what to have in the habitat, how to not get fried by radiation, etc.
The book is for a non-technical audience but occasionally there's some interesting science thrown in with a huge warning note that says High Science Content. One thing that I found quite amusing was his rant on cyclers. I had a friend who worked on cyclers for his Master's thesis back at Georgia Tech and I wonder what he'll say about this. Let me go on with Zubrin's points on disadvantages of cyclers.
Cyclers, short for cycling space stations, are huge space stations built to last a long time for the role of allowing permanent transfer orbits between Earth and another planet like Mars. Once setup, such large structures do not have to be relaunched and people can just catch the trip by catching the cyclers in small, fast "taxi" capsules fired from each planet. Yet, there's definite issues which I have ascertained from reading and reflecting on Zubrin's intelligent rants:
Some interesting issues right? We'll see how it pans out in the future but I think Zubrin has convinced me not to support cyclers if they ever do gain a broad interest.
[Image credit: http://buzzaldrin.com/]